Timeline for How to express important subjective nuances of language in a neutral way.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2011 at 18:20 | comment | added | user unknown | +1 case by case basis. | |
| Jun 2, 2011 at 2:37 | comment | added | BudgieInWA | Well structured comments (that should be upvoted) and possible downvoting of bad answers sounds like a good plan to me. If it becomes a norm, that veterans are aware of this, and practice this, it should become obvious that it is looked down on. | |
| Jun 1, 2011 at 10:59 | comment | added | Glen Wheeler | @thei Yes, I would too. This is why we have to be careful. | |
| Jun 1, 2011 at 10:54 | comment | added | Phira | Well, ok, it would be enough to agree on these examples for now. My point is that the underlying information in the two examples is neither wrong nor useless. I totally *would * recommend to use the Genetiv construction because it is a better language level. | |
| Jun 1, 2011 at 10:49 | history | answered | Glen Wheeler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |