I'm curious as to the rejection reason for this edit. The reviewer subsequently made almost the same edit himself with the exception of the change to the title, which IMO was the critical part of the edit given the potential ambiguity of the original title ("when to use der/die/das") with respect to (grammatical) gender (see edit comment "Changing title to avoid confusion with "when to use der/die/das wrt. gender.)
Secondly, I'm interested in the denial by Community that happened at the same time, which gave the following rejection reason: "This edit did not correct critical issues with the post - view the revision history to see what should have been changed. Given that the reviewer's own edit was a subset of mine, it follows that it must have fixed the critical critical issues that the reviewer saw in the question.
Thanks in advance for the clarification!