Timeline for Spelling mistakes in questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://german.stackexchange.com/ with https://german.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 5, 2012 at 20:56 | comment | added | Alenanno | @Gigili I understand that, but that person didn't even try to look. A simple eye-searching would have revealed that the spelling was suggested. I understood it without even reading. But anyway, this is my opinion, if no-one agrees with me, the question will stay open, but this is my judgement. :D | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 20:52 | comment | added | user508 | I don't agree with you Alennano. If we should close the question, so what's the difference between SE and an online dictionary? The person didn't know it includes a misspelling. I think it's not fair to close questions like that. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 18:56 | comment | added | user unknown |
1st paragraph: that the question must be closed is an Answer to the schäckern-question only, since there is no reason to close a question for a spelling mistake. proof that the OP didn't try in the second paragraph: again off topic. 3rd paragraph: I'd leave it to the original form - again to the schäckern-topic, not to general spelling errors in headlines. If you don't edit or delete your post yourself, I have to flag it for moderator attention.
|
|
| Feb 4, 2012 at 17:07 | comment | added | Alenanno | @userunknown Read my last comment and my answer carefully. I'll post there too, though. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 17:05 | comment | added | user unknown | If you don't want to discuss the general question, how to handle spelling mistakes, but this particular one, please use this alternative thread: meta.german.stackexchange.com/q/336/266 Please move off-topic parts of your answer from this thread. Thank you. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 13:14 | history | edited | Alenanno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added part from comments
|
| Feb 4, 2012 at 13:01 | comment | added | user unknown | Kann bitte mal jemand verstehen, dass es mir nicht um den "schäckern"-Beitrag geht, sondern um einen allgemeinen Umgang mit Schreibfehlern in Fragen, insbesondere dem Titel der Frage? Der Beitrag war nur ein Beispiel. Deine Antwort ist keine Antwort auf meine Frage, und daher off-topic. Bitte diskutier in einem eigenen Thread die Details des Umgangs mit dem "schäckern"-Thread; Du hast das Recht dafür einen neuen Thread zu erstellen, und es ist gar nicht so schwer. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 13:01 | comment | added | Alenanno | @userunknown No hijacking: my suggestion is the same. Peculiar cases will require further analysis. But I'd do the same in other cases. If the mistake is a central part of the question, you shouldn't edit it, otherwise you affect the meaning of the question and this is not allowed. If it's a typo that won't affect the meaning of the question, you can edit it. If a quick and easy search reveals the answer, close the question. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 12:57 | comment | added | user unknown | Please understand that this thread is not a discussion about what should be done with this particular thread, which is only an example, but how we behave in the general case of misspellings in the question title. Your answer is off topic for my question. If you like to discuss the problem of the "schäckern"-Thread in depth, please open a new thread; it's allowed, it's easy, there is no reason to hijack my thread. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 11:58 | history | answered | Alenanno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |