Timeline for Visits per day -- should we be worried?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2012 at 22:30 | answer | added | Eugene Seidel | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 12, 2012 at 0:29 | answer | added | user unknown | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 24, 2011 at 14:39 | comment | added | takrl | @user unknown Summer slump? | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 20:28 | answer | added | adolf garlic | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 1, 2011 at 19:27 | comment | added | user unknown |
Can actual visitor numbers be related to holidays in Germany? What is the english word for Sommerloch?
|
|
| Jul 30, 2011 at 10:06 | comment | added | Hendrik Vogt |
At the moment it's down to 140 visits/day, which really looks worrying :-(
|
|
| Jul 29, 2011 at 22:45 | answer | added | Hauser | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 25, 2011 at 16:26 | comment | added | Deve | I'm also worried by the frequency of new questions that has declined strongly. My impression is that we have about 4 new questions per day at the moment, which I think is not enough to make people come back frequently. | |
| Jun 23, 2011 at 10:13 | answer | added | musiKk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 23, 2011 at 10:11 | history | edited | Glen Wheeler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added an implied question
|
| Jun 23, 2011 at 10:06 | comment | added | Tim Mod | For reference: GL&U currently has 220 visitors/day. The slightly older betas are mostly in the 300-400 range, and the younger ones mostly 150-200. SE claims that 500 is worrying and 1500 is healthy. | |
| Jun 23, 2011 at 9:48 | history | asked | Glen Wheeler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |